Free the scarlet letter Essays and Papers
Free the scarlet letter papers, essays, and research papers.
And that brings me to Lillian Gish. Gish is always superb and it is refreshing to see her perform a far more subtle and complex role than the melodramatic simplicities offered by D.W. Griffith. I can’t think of another actress of the day who could have delivered Hester Prynne with so much depth and empathy. While it’s true the Hester always ultimate rejects the Puritantic strictures she has the wisdom to appreciate the comfort that this order delivers to other people. While she will not go so far as to be ashamed of her bloomers, she will at least make an effort to shield them from the male gaze. In The Scarlet Letter, the demands of Hester Prynne’s character falls right in line with Gish’s exceptional talents. Gish never delivers a discrete emotion. With her we don’t get happiness, we get happiness tinged with sorrow, or despair with an aura of hope, or… well, you get the picture. In this movie, she is absolutely riveting and brings to life some rather obtuse thematic tropes.
Femininity in The Scarlet Letter – Mikaela Bray
The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, set in an old Puritan community, is centered on several conflicts of human nature that result from the adultery and punishment of Hester Prynne.
Nathaniel Hawthorne | American Gloom
Nathaniel Hawthorne's use of nature imagery in The Scarlet Letter reflects Pearl's wild, capricious character that serves as a constant reminder of Hester's sin and whose romantically idealistic beauty frightens the Puritan society....
Posts about Nathaniel Hawthorne written by Ezekiel Fry
As a result of the adulterous relationship, the authorities of The Puritan society that she is residing in sentences her to wear a Scarlet Letter on her breast that is supposed to stand for adulterer, stand on a scaffold in front of the entire community for public viewing of her Scarlet Letter and Pearl, and serve a prison sentence....
Fifty Orwell Essays, by George Orwell, free ebook
Like Cathars and Cromwell, the American Puritans are assumed to have been particularly severe, but in an age when judicial mutilation was commonplace in England and Europe, and where capital crimes were innumerable and unpublished, evidence I have seen suggests that the Puritans were notably restrained. A scarlet letter, however regrettable in itself, is certainly to be preferred to slashed nostrils and cropped ears. I name this famous letter, fictional as I assume it is, because Hawthorne’s novel has served as evidence of an appalling severity, when in historical context it would have been no such thing. The Crucible is about the McCarthy era, of course, but it is taught as a phenomenon that captures the essence of American Puritanism, whereas witch trials were carried on in Britain and Europe into the 18th century, long after they ended in New England. All this should be too obvious to need saying, and yet these two works of fiction lie like a glacier on the history of America’s radical and progressive history, obscuring questions such as why, by the time of the writing of the Constitution, slavery could be described as an institution peculiar to the South, with enslaved populations allowed for in the representation of southern states exclusively. Recently publicized evidence that slave labor was used in the colonial North demonstrates its economic viability in the North, and that under British law there were no limits to its use. And still in 1789 it could be called peculiar to the South.