They make up the conclusion to another argumentative essay.
The argumentative essay starts with an introduction.
OnceI realized that I was pursuing a poetics, I started to understand why some scholarsresisted my conclusions. For many, a film writer’s central taskis to interpret and evaluate individual works—as art, as politics, as expressionof social identity or modern culture. Judicious criticism of one stripe or anotheris taken as the heart of film studies. So anything that smacks of generalizationdoes violence to the integrity of the film at hand. For other scholars, tracinggeneral principles of form and style within a tradition isn’t theoreticalenough if the conclusions don’t lead to generalizations about culture asa whole. Middle-level theorizing isn’t considered interesting. In addition,an emphasis on aesthetics is suspect. At once over-theorized and under-Theorized,a poetics of cinema still lies outside many academics’ agendas.
IELTS essays: how to write conclusions
Twenty-five years later, and after studying a lot more movies from the era, Istill think that we are dealing with a collective invention. It’s an academicstyle without much of a canon. In this respect (and to revise the formulationin our proposal), classical filmmaking isn’t a well-punctuated group stylelike Viennese classical music or Impressionist painting. It develops more inthe manner that visual perspective, or, to take a musical analogy, Western tonalitydid. Certainly there were powerful filmmakers who took the received style infresh directions, and sometimes those creators influenced others. But in itstotality, the classical Hollywood style is an instance of an “art historywithout names.” It is the result of many routine iterations, accompaniedby both striking innovations and minor tweaks. It was maintained for decadesby a host of creators both major and minor, famous and anonymous. Gathering datafrom films en masse seems to suit a collective trend.