Mellor (Cambridge, 1990) andNils-Eric Sahlin,

Examinations of the Communist "Hollywood Ten" on the "E!" Entertainment cable network praise them for "standing up for what they believed in," even though they didn't stand up for what they believed in (Communism), since they either refused to say anything or took the Fifth Amendment, and, what's worse, they did so on instructions of the Communist Party!

This work was a significant influence on that of and .

by James Murphy and Carole Newlands (Northern Illinois, 1986).

by Mimi Reisel Gladstein and Chris Matthew Sciabarra (Penn.

Paul acknowledged early on that his filibuster — a blocking tactic to delay — was doomed to failure, with too little support in Congress. But he vowed to “speak until I can no longer speak,” demanding a specific guarantee that Obama will not use drones to kill U.S. citizens on U.S. soil.

} as the only reliable source of human .

Paul’s moment sparked a real-time online frenzy, with instant endorsements from unlikely bedmates, including Amnesty International, Code Pink and other voices from the progressive edge of America’s gaping hyperpartisan divide.

In addition to the social theories reflected in her popular novels, (1943), (1946), and (1947).

Brown, (Routledge, 1988);, ed.

Paul had help, with a handful of Republican colleagues jumping in to ask questions and give his voice a rest. At as the fifth hour rolled around, a single Democrat, Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, joined in, praising Paul for “digging in, trying to excavate how (the drone program) works.”

Recommended Reading:Plato, , tr.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid failed to scuttle the filibuster at the six-hour mark, telling Paul “the rest of the body needs to know if we’re going to finish tonight, or tomorrow, or the next day.”

Grube (Hackett, 1983) andDominic Scott, (Cambridge, 1995).

Paul answered that he would end his talk immediately upon a pledge from Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder that no Americans will be killed by drones on U.S. soil.

Causey, (Jones & Bartlett, 2001);Raymond M.

Reid snapped back: “I’m not in a position to talk to the attorney general. Everyone should plan on coming tomorrow. We’re through for the night.”

Rand introduced the philosophy of objectivism in  (1966)and defended a version of in (1964).

Schoedinger (Humanity, 1991);Richard I.

160 years ago, after the Southwest had belonged to Mexico for all of 25 years, with a population consisting mainly of native Indians, not Mexican immigrants).

Augustine Press, 1997);David Miller,  (Open Court, 1994); andLaurence Bonjour,  (Cambridge, 1997).

Munitz, (Princeton, 1992);John W.

Thus, as soon as Rand allows that the terms for features "abstracted" from experience refer to features that are , then she has let in some form of Aristotelian realism, whether she wants to or not.

Aaron,  (Haskell House, 1975);Theodore Scaltsas,  (Cornell, 1994);, ed.

Searle, (Free Press, 1997); andRobert Kirk, (Routledge, 1999).

But in seizing upon the largely unexplored questions of drones, Paul awakened bipartisan — if minority — excitement, insisting from the Senate floor that “No president can act as judge, jury and executioner.”