Kant v. Mill: Pros and Cons - Mesa Community College
Kant and Mill | UniMasters Custom Essays
Mill's utilitarian justification of secondary principles is intendedas a contrast with the intuitionism of William Whewell and others. Ashe makes clear in his essay “Whewell on MoralPhilosophy”(CW X), Mill thinks that the intuitionistwrongly treats familiar moral precepts as ultimate moral factors whosejustification is supposed to be self-evident. By contrast, Mill'saccount of secondary principles recognizes their importance in moralreasoning but insists that they are neither innate nor infallible; theyare precepts that have been adopted and internalized because of theiracceptance value, and their continued use should be suitably regulatedby their ongoing comparative acceptance value. Far from underminingutilitarian first principles, Mill thinks, appeal to the importance ofsuch moral principles actually provides support for utilitarianism.
Free Papers and Essays on Kant And Mill
Both philosophers have deep thought on morality. Mill has his thoughts based on utilitarian grounds. This is a system revolves around the reasonable happiness of the people around a person. It teaches that one needs to act in a way that ensures the happiness of those around them. On the other hand, Kant has his philosophy of giving morality a more philosophical feel. He teaches that law, reasoning and the human nature should be the determinants of morals and not how pleased or happy a person is with the other. Morality is the root of human interaction and without it, humans would not know right from wrong. Morality is very important and between the two philosophers, great work had been done to try and critically analyze the sensitive issue of human morality.